Science and Technology

5 thoughts on “Science and Technology



    The Julian calendar is the only measurement of time that is accurate to the days of the year, with no left over’s year in and year out. This calendar is in alignment with the moon cycles for the months, as well as the sun for the seasons of the year.
    This calendar has 28 days in a month and 336 days in a year, this measurement of time has been trusted and used from the first introduction in 46B.C. till 1582.Then in 1582 it was decided by Pope Gregory the 13th to switch way of keeping time to the Gregorian Calendar, this measurement of our years allows to have our seasons stuck at certain times of each year. Even though the implementation of the Gregorian calendar in 1582 it spread slowly across civilization, taking 300 years. Today there are still people who rely on the cycles of the moon as well as the sun to calculate time.
    From 1582 till the beginning of the 20th century the Pope who began this form of time keeping, was forced onto the world, even though the Catholic Church knows this is not right.
    The cycles of the moon as well as the sun are there for a reason. The movement of seasons aligns humans to be in touch with nature, not to over burden the same section of earth. Sadly, now day we will not hear of such things.
    Questions must be raised about the way we calculate time with the Gregorian calendar, considering the cycles have been here from the beginning . The countries which stayed with the Julian calendar, have been left in the past. For instance today by Gregorian standard it is March 2020, in Ethiopia just one of several countries who kept the Julian way to measure seasons, are in the year 2013 7 years behind the Gregorian calendar.
    Over the last 5 centuries we have rejected the natural cycles of nature, and replaced it with our idea of the way it should be with our standard of time measurement. By changing the natural cycle we have upset the balance, compared to the thousands of years previous.

    We fail to realize that everything is connected, or we just ignore the evidence. In other words we have created our own time with changes to suit our needs, ignoring the natural balance.
    Below are links to the difference between the Gregorian and Julias calendar.




    Part 3

    This time we will look at the CO2 emitted by the oceans, soil, and rocks, it is a fact that the oceans cover 70% of the planet. Therefore we allow the powerful to dictate what we understand to be fact.
    Science claims that, it is assumed the oceans release 0.6 gigatons of carbon per year, this sounds true, however there are no solid facts to back up their claim.
    Government puppets ignore the facts when it doesn’t align with their agenda.
    As l will show in a link, there is no way we have the technology to measure to amount of CO2 being produced at any given time.
    This paper stops the myth of man made CO2 in it’s tracks, using their numbers.
    Most of the estimates of volcanogenic carbon dioxide emissions are woefully low, say’s consulting geologist Timothy Casey. An enormous amount CO2 unmeasured escapes from underwater volcanoes daily.
    Underwater eruption

    Lava contains a surprising high amount of CO2, say’s Timothy Casey in his paper “Volcanic Carbon Dioxide”
    Carbon dioxide emissions from volcanoes under water dwarf man made contributions. We need to remember that there are 3 million under water volcanoes. Studies show the Pacific mid plate seamounts number between 22,000 to 55,000, 2,000 of these are active volcanoes.
    There are also lakes of CO2 on the ocean floor, CO2 is expelled from the hydrothermal vent systems.
    There is nothing stopping this CO2 mixing with sea water and making it to the surface. After surveying 201,055 under water volcanoes, Hillier&Watts estimated a total of 3,477,403 worldwide of which 139,096 are active.
    It would be fair to say that, because planet earth is covered with 70% water we would more volcanoes underwater than above.
    The puppets have totally ignored the amount CO2 these volcanoes produce, yes it is this way ignore the facts and blame the public for the levels of CO2. This is the lie we live under, it’s all about the money.
    This link has been added to show to general public mind set about CO2 levels, brainwashed to the point where the truth and the facts don’t mean anything.

    The carbon dioxide levels over the last 10,000 years the levels have been stable for the most part, until for the last 500 years the CO2 levels have increased to a level never seen for millions of years. With the misinformation about our climate’s CO2 level, it is easy to dismiss the volcanoes, the missing trees man took and not replaced. Instead of addressing the real problem they will blame human activity, this is a win win for the elite.

    In this next link l am seeing the numbers not adding up, we know that they are not able to produce numbers like that. All theories, guesses, and ideas.

    Over the last 2,000 years there have been many eruptions on land as well as in the oceans, all expelling huge amounts of CO2 and ash high into the atmosphere. Some of these eruptions have blocked out the sun for periods of time, this may be the answer to unbalanced CO2 levels. It just so happened that man started using fossil fuels, the last 100 to 150 years.

    After seeing the government scientists saying , that there is no way we can measure to levels of CO2 produced l am sceptical about the numbers in the next link. When we consider the size of earth, 70% water, 3 million volcanoes, and 1/3 of aprox. 30% of the land with forests.
    They claim that we have more trees now that 100 years ago, it doesn’t take much thought to realize that we are lied to.
    Anyone who puts a bit of thought into the lack of forests, compared to 100 years ago it is clear to see the population as well as the cities have grown. In the process we have destroyed the plants we need to survive, no trees no oxygen. Looks clear cut to me.
    Mother nature has kept the balance on this planet for many thousands of years, they all agree on that. The only thing that is different from 100 years ago and now is that man has started clear cutting the planet of trees. We know that if they told everyone the truth, they wouldn’t be raking in the cash from us slaves.
    These links go deeper into the article l have written.

    Click to access human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-intermediate.pdf




    In part two we will look at the levels of CO2 the earth produces, from volcanoes, to the ocean, as well as the deforestation .
    How responsible are we as humans for the CO2 levels we see today? Through scientific data we can see the levels clearly reaching higher levels than expected, so the government scientists down play or dismiss the truth.
    In the largest cases a single plume only lasting a few hours, will send millions of tons of CO2 into the air. With the eruptions daily from around the earth, is it possible that humans contribute small amounts of CO2 less than we have been lead to believe.
    ZME science has a government bias about the CO2, and who produces more man or nature?

    The USGS alongside other government information controlled organizations, say according to their data claim volcanoes emit 200 million tons of CO2 annually.
    When Mount Pinatubo erupted, it sent 42 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. They dare to claim that even with this scale of activity, it doesn’t match mans activity. Pinatubo’s release of pressure created enough of a change that, the global temperatures dropped almost 1 degree in the years 1991 to 1993.
    With the USGS admitting an almost full degree drop linked to the eruption, they are in agreement with their findings. With all of the cores of ice, they claim they best guess amounts. Is it that the data doesn’t fit into their grab for money?
    The data from the British Geological Survey [ BGS], the equivalent to USGS has different data. They are all taking a guess as well as theories as to the amount of CO2 nature contributes. Their estimates claim that volcanoes emit 300 million tons of CO2 in an average year, this is their best guess. In the same breath they say what man’s contribution far out weighs any volcano.

    Volcano eruptions can change a lot of things, but they’re not responsible for climate change. Image credits: Christina Neal, AVO/USGS.

    With all of the guess work not relying on data from ice cores, they estimate between 200 to 300 million tons of CO2 to what they claim to be 24 billion tons by man. We need to keep in mind that this is just a best guess on their part, and we are told this is the truth.
    CO2 is a greenhouse gas that regulates the temperature of earth, as well as allows trees to grow. But they won’t admit that, it’s the truth. What they claim is volcanoes emit large amounts of CO2, but no where near as much as man. They say they know this with a great degree of certainty.


    In February of 2020 it was decided to revise the numbers they used in the past, because the numbers don’t add up. The more people question our changing climate the more government science panics.
    When Mount Pinatubo erupted it was the largest in the past 100 years. This eruption is a good example of a stratospheric eruption, reaching into the stratosphere.
    When particles reach that high, and stay the dust reflects sunlight to the point where the earth goes into a cooling period.
    The University of Maryland, Grenoble Alpes, Ecole Normale Superieure, and the Tokyo Institute of Tech, devised a more accurate system for stratospheric eruptions in layers of ice cores.
    Using their method researchers made revisions, because the information was not accurate as well as misidentifying events. So we ask, how are we sure that they are right this time in their findings?




    There is much information about how our planet is warmer now than it ever has been, and therefore many see it as not a normal cycle of the universe. But a bad thing for humans, not seeing the whole picture.
    We have weather records dating back thousands of years, cycles like the one we are now in has happened before, more than once.
    If we put aside what we are told as well as taught, and review the facts. We will realize that we are being mislead daily, my thoughts on this is follow the money.
    I will show many records from the past as well as the present:
    The Inter governmental Panel on Climate Change claim that, it is extremely likely that human influence has been the cause of the warming in the 20th century. They claim humans are the cause for the rise in greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide.
    When we do the research we see that most of the climate leaders, all agree that these 3 elements are the cause of greenhouse gases caused by humans.
    There needs to be less reliance on peoples word, and more on digging for the facts. Computers, books were reliable for correct information, however this is not so in the past 20 to 30 years. Why do people not question this, no one we learn to understand anything around us from our weather to our planet.
    What is it?
    In the 17th century Jan Baptista Van Helmont discovered carbon dioxide is unlike any other gas. It liquefies upon compression to 75 kg per square centimetre at a tempeture of 31C. When carbon dioxide is frozen it is called dry ice. At ordinary temperatures, carbon dioxide decomposes into carbon monoxide and oxygen.When Ammonia is mixed with CO2 under pressure Ammonia Carbamate, then UREA. The chemicals combined produce fertilizers, plastics, fire extinguishers, inflating life jackets, rubber, plastics, carbonated drinks, and also promotes healthy growth in plants.
    Carbon dioxide is a tasteless, odourless gas that makes up LESS than 1 % of the earth’s atmosphere.
    One molecule of carbon dioxide contains one atom of carbon and two atoms of oxygen,
    This non-metallic chemical belongs to Group 14 {IVA} on the periodic table, even though we are led to believe that the Carbon Dioxide is highly concentrated on t planet earth. It is not, it only makes up 0.025 of the earth’s crust and less than 1% of our atmosphere. CO2 even thought the amount is low it still manages to form more compounds than all other elements combined. Sounds like if we loose our Carbon Dioxide, life would be far worse than we have it now.
    In the crust of earth, carbon is a minor component. When carbon combines with other elements, life is able to continue. We can thank Carbon Dioxide for our way of life as well as the other chemicals created through this process. Such as Magnesium, Calcium, Magnesite, Dolomite, Marble, Limestone, Coral. Carbon is widely used in society we have grown way too dependent on our Petroleum, Natural Gas, as well as all of the plastics we have grown accustom to.
    Man made climate misinformed believers claim, we are the creators of the CO2 levels we have now in the 21 century. Do we take their word? When we look at the history of the CO2 levels, they are not as high as has been in the past. Theories have been repeated daily in our schools as well as society, that science is right without showing only view. The natural cycle of everything we know and not know has a cycle, nothing we know of stays the same always changing. Over the history of earth there have serious changes without man’s interference.
    Science claims that the earth’s atmosphere is out of balance, where is the proof for such claims? Just by saying a few words without solid facts, they can claim that man must be the cause for our change in planet weather.
    These planet fear mongers demand we as citizens pay for the natural order of the weather, all it takes is a few chosen words without facts. Why do we believe them? Is it our excuse, we don’t have the time, or is it that we are so gullible that we will believe anything.
    Should we ask what do they mean by this?
    While scientists are FAIRLY CERTAIN that 100 million years ago CO2 was much higher than today, my red flag is up “fairly certain”? In general terms CO2 levels back 500 million years ago show the climate CO2 levels were higher, however they fail to mention that it was a different world then if they are right about their time line. They just fail to mention that the world then had a climate, vegetation, as well as animals. Much of the wildlife and the vegetation went extinct, no mention of that.
    The more l look for hard facts the more harder it is to make sense of the information available,
    It is easier to find the facts in older books, l am seeing a pattern.

    Does science offer the facts, it doesn’t appear that way. Furthermore when people use numbers and letters to explain our world around us and are wrong, it is easy just go back and change numbers to make their ideas, theory’s , thoughts, believable.
    Has anyone noticed that anything science can’t explain with numbers, they call a myth or a fairy tale. Even the scientists cannot agree how much influence man has had on planet earth. If we choose to believe in science, then we as humans are to be blamed for all of the changes. How could we accept science facts when all data is based on theories?
    Government agenda science allows them to take our hard earned money like a bully in a school yard. When a theory is spun to show the citizens as the wrong doers, it is easy to demand money weather or not what they say is based on fact. However this is not the case, independent facts show a clearer picture.
    I do agree with the removal of the trees being a serious problem, take the earth’s lungs and we wonder why the CO2 levels are high, dah.
    I will show both sides of this climate debate in an un bias manner, starting with the government scientists as well as the history records which l may add were very hard to find.
    Professor Ruddiman says, atmospheric levels of CO2 began to rise when humans started clearing forests, and the levels of Methane levels increased 3000 years later. Now l ask why does Methane even come into this discussion, it lagged behind 3000 years? Starting to see a pattern yet?
    Then in the next paragraph Ruddiman claims that, atmospheric levels of CO2 and Methene naturally fluctuate because of the changes in orbit of earth and the resulting amounts of sun light.
    Scientists assumed the factory age that human activity had a significant effect on the climate. The changes in our climate in the past looking at the levels of CO2 as well as Methene were attributed to natural causes says Ruddiman. In a clearer English language they are ignoring history data, sounds like they are hiding the facts.
    Their words are chosen carefully, like this line.
    They say that prehistoric practices APPARENTLY overrode a build up of ice that their models predicted over the last 5000 years.
    Nasa gov. claim that the temperature is controlled by the CO2 in the air, however they fall short of blaming man for the cause. Maybe citizens are waking up and calling them out on the bs.

    This is part one of several, all of the links are below.
    This article as well as the video helps to explain, how the balance is upset with the CO2. The wealthy as well as the greedy will not accept the facts, they are the ones who should be held accountable for the removal of the trees. Not the citizens who are forced to buy into their scam.
    There are many reasons for people to hide the truth, as well as misleading the public. I always look who will benefit the most, it is always the ones who are raking in the money.




    Is a phenomenon that occurs when the majority of worker bees in a colony disappear and leave behind a queen, plenty of food and a few nurse bees to care for the remaining immature bees.
    Several possible causes for CCD have been proposed, but no single proposal has gained wide spread acceptance among the scientific community. A large amount of speculation has surrounded a family of pesticides called Neonicotinoids as having caused CCD.

    According to the USDA, pesticides may be contributing to CCD. A 2013 peer-reviewed literarure review concluded neonicotinoids in the amounts typically used harm bees and safer alternatives are urgently needed. When an independent peer-review group finds these types of problems with pesticides affecting the bee population we need to listen.

    Scientists have long been concerned that pesticides, including possibly some fungicides, may have sublethal effects on bees, not outright killing them but poisoning them slowly. Neonicotinoids that contain poisons such as, imidacloprid, clothiandin, and thiamethoxam, these chemicals are used with seeding treatment because they work their way to the flowers and slowly poisons the bees.

    A exhausted survey of health study in 2010 found that CCD- affected colonies also revealed elevated levels of pesticides in wax and pollen, but the amounts of pesticides were similar in both failing and healthy hives. They as well confirmed links between CCD and poor health, and adequate diet. Studies continue to show very high levels of pathogens in CCD affected samples and lower levels in unaffected samples. The observation have led them to believe that the bee death is connected to immune suppression.

    In 2012 researchers found that the sublethal exposure to imidacloprid rendered honey bees significantly more susceptible to infection to the Nosema fungus, there by suggesting a potential link to CCD.

    Also, in 2012 researchers in Italy published findings that the pneumatic drilling machines that plant corn seed coated with clothianidin and imidacloprid released large amounts of the pesticide into the air, causing significant mortality in foraging honey bees. Thiamethoxam causes navigational homing failure of the foraging bees, with high morality.

    Neonicotinoids Toxicity
    A dramatic rise in the number of annual beehive losses noticed around 2006 spurred interest in factors potentially affecting bees health. When first introduced neonicotinoids were though to have low toxicity to many insects, but recent research has suggested a potential toxicity to honey bees as well as other beneficial insects even with low levels of contact. Chemicals such as we use to produce more of a yield is taking a toll on one of the most important insects we depend on to pollinate our flowers, fruit trees, etc.

    This lack of respect for the living creatures we share planet earth with must stop before it is too late, once we hit a tipping point there will be no turning back.

    Thiamethoxam Toxicity

    It has a broad spectrum of use against many types of insects. The down side of this poison is that it affects bumble bees, honey bees according to an independent European scientific studies from 2014.

    Doses of thiamethoxam(0.05—2ng/bee) have been known to cause reduced foraging activity since at least 1999, but this was quantified in 2012 by RFID tagged honeybees. Doses of equal or more that 0.5 ng/bee caused longer foraging flights.

    These are a countless amount of chemicals that not only affect insects but larger animals as well, we know that humans find themselves sick in one form or another it is like too many off days then a few where we feel good.

    It is a fact that the major companies who are involved in this destruction of animals as well as people, will not take responsibility for their actions, all they are concerned with is the profit. The living things on this planet are at the mercy of these money hungry tyrants, we can’t depend on the government to investigate the poisoning of every living thing.

    Even many of the citizens turn a blind eye to these problems, maybe they don’t see the connection between the food production and the insects that make it possible. People in general are not aware that if it wasn’t for the bees we would die out because of the lack of food.

    Everything from the chemical trails sprayed in the air, to the pesticides that are sprayed on our food which drains off into our water supply, with this being said everything on planet earth is being killed off slowly by being poisons.

    In light of this on going destruction of life, there is some good news. Ecojustice is a group who investigates and with their lawyers are making a stand to stop this poisoning of our food as well as the bees who we depend on for our food.

    I am leaving a link below for anyone who is interested in not starving to death, and send a clear message to the companies that we know what they are doing.

    Donate online at: http://WWW.ECOJUSTICE.CA/SUPPORT


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s